Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cost per Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Cost per Day

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotes adSemble and in turn nMotion technologies. Author mentioned find their approach mathematical, analytical and scientific as a contest against the Pro-D earlier, but does not give any source for coming to that conclusion nor does the article have any relation to this statement. Article mentions powered by their proprietary "procession algorithm" and no details are given. So it is only promoting the company and product giving such uncited and likely copyrighted items (since it says proprietary). The provided links are also promotions only and are not encyclopaedic references.


 * Delete, promotional at best, nonsensical at worst. Stifle (talk) 17:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks independant services and article appears to exist solely to promote a non-notable corporation. Edward321 (talk) 21:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is it distinctly advertising, it's nigh incomprehensible.  There's one reference that isn't the corporate website, and it's a blog posting.  Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 04:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.