Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Costa Navarino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Richard-of-Earth (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Costa Navarino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason: Since NOTADVERTISING, this page should be deleted (as in German, Italian, and other similar project). Not notable, no reliable sources Louisbeta (talk) 08:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 26.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  08:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This article should be about the development started by TEMES S.A. not a travel guide per WP:NOTGUIDE. TEMES S.A was formed in the late 1990s by the Konstantakopoulos shipowning family of Messinia (See Vassilis C. Constantakopoulos) to develop tourism for the area. See this article about it. However "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" per WP:GNG do not exist. All the references for this article are connected to it or articles about what a great place it is to travel to. It is a shame, because it looks like a great project that is doing good things. (Unless you hate tourism.) Such as supporting science. It also seems to be the largest of it's kind in Greece. Deserves a mention on the Tourism in Greece page. Not a whole article. Another article to look at is Navarino Icons, but perhaps the criteria for food brand names are lower, I don't know (yet). Richard-of-Earth (talk) 18:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - The article is 100% spam and apepars to be copied from here. I've tagged it for speedy deletion as a copyvio but I would be equally comfortable tagging it for speedy deletion as spam. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.