Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cotswold Rangers F.C


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 04:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Cotswold Rangers F.C

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Newly-formed amateur football team playing in Division Eight of their local district league, miles below the accepted cut-off for notability ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Remember that the cut-off is a guide, Cotswold might have received plenty of coverage in reliable sources regardless. In future I propose that you always remember to mention a lack of reliable sources per gnews or similar. Sandman888 (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable for their football, as they play in a league that is close to the bottom of the football pyramid (level 21 of 23). No indication that they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG for any other reason. WhaleyTim (talk) 11:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, non-notable team. GiantSnowman 11:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable club. Argyle 4 Life  talk  12:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Way too far down the football pyramid (they're down near the bottom of it) to be considered notable and - perhaps unsurprisingly, seeing that they're in the 21st Level of the footy pyramid - nowhere near meeting Wp:GNG. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  13:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete pub-team is the term? Sandman888 (talk) 08:58, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.