Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cottage Home


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 20:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Cottage Home

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Tiny homebuilding company in western Michigan. All coverage is trivial. Fails WP:ORG. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  00:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Besides what you already said, the article is rather spammy. Nyttend (talk) 01:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.
 * Keep. I eliminated some material that seemed unnecessary, formatted references properly, and added one. I think notability is shown now. - Eastmain (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: A general search returns very few reliable source references, and mostly the typical directory site listings found for any business. I reviewed the newly included references, and even with those added I do not believe that the article meets notability standards. One of the articles is from a relatively small newspaper, another references an award given to the company by a local chamber of commerce, and the third contains a passing reference to the company but is not about the company. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is no evidence to support a claim to notability in accordance with WP:CORP, only routine news reports which do not provide anythink near the level significant coverage that would suggest this company has generated any interest beyond advertising of its serivices and products. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 11:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.