Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cotton Candy (My Little Pony)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Cotton Candy (My Little Pony)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A poor article with questionable fansites as a source to demonstrate its notability, with even more questionable notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep How about this: LEAVE these topics alone!Blackgaia02 (Talk if you&#39;re Worthy) (talk) 10:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Logan Talk Contributions 12:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Dubious sourcing. No indication of sufficient notability to justify a self-standing article. --DAJF (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of My Little Pony characters. As with Pokémon, there are MLP characters that have signifcant third-party coverage that establish notability, but this isn't one of those. (Batten down the hatches, the bronies will undoubtedly be here making bad arguments in 3, 2, 1...) —Tom Morris (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  19:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete if all the other pony articles are gone I don't see why this one should stay. SalfEnergy 15:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not deserve its own page. Remember MLP fanboys: create these kinds of pages on fan wikis, not wikipedia.  --Harizotoh9 (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.