Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cougar women


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 04:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Cougar women
Verifiability is shaky; probably merits a Wiktionary entry (like MILF), but most of this article is POV and unencyclopedic.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. 95% of this is deletable as unverifiable and POV. Grutness...wha?  05:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Bhoeble 09:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Biased article. POV is there.-- 陈 鼎  翔    贡献  Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, heavily biased and POVed. -- so U  m  y  a  S  ch  10:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. A simple definition would suffice, if proprely sourced, and that's not enough to warrant an article. PJM 11:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV article, unverifiable. --Ter e nce Ong 12:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unverifiable, POV article. J I P  | Talk 17:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It has POV and original research issues that have to be fixed, but the topic itself is worthy of an article.  Arctic Gnome 21:28, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article documents a significant (some might say alarming) social trend. The premise of the article is verifiable. davidzuccaro 13:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NPOV and WP:V. No prejudice against a proper article replacing it. Stifle (talk) 01:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a neologism - Richardcavell 05:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Well of course a new and emerging social trend is going to need a new combination of words to describe it.davidzuccaro 22:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as being unverified. *drew 04:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.