Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Council for the Registration of Schools Teaching Dyslexic Pupils


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The talk page of the article here is instructive, cf. ; this nomination seems to have been intended to harass another editor. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Council for the Registration of Schools Teaching Dyslexic Pupils

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This page does not reach standard for notability or importance.

AfD formatted correctly for User:Totolatin (talk/contribs) by Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 11:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep (article creator). The four sources present in the article (if User:Totolin hasn't blanked them again recently) are, in my opinion, sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Much as I'd like to assume good faith, I also have to question the nominator's motive for this nomination, given his SPA-like edit history. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 11:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - reasonably notable organisation. Good sources. Seems to fulfil WP:GNG Fmph (talk) 12:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - a well sourced article which complies with the Wikipedia core policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dahliarose (talk • contribs) 13:03, 26 April 2012‎
 * Snow Keep this appears to be a revenge AfD for Yunshui's comments and contributions at this acrimonious AfD, see this diff in particular, which was, coincidentally, just before this AfD was filed. Article and sources look fine, can we snow this to save further time-wasting?  Captain Screebo Parley! 16:08, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - passes WP:NOTE and per Captain.  Yash  t  101   09:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.