Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Council of Armed Rabbis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 01:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Council of Armed Rabbis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Six ghits, no evidence that this is a PAC - looked failed on Open Secrets ; possible hoax. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Keep, I think. I mean, it says it's registered and google seems to also say that. Well, I mean, it'd be nice if it could be kept. Ya know? Bstone (talk) 04:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Bstone, you wrote the article. Can you point out where Google says it is registered? --Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete My car is officially registered, but it's not notable. Sorry I seem to be in kind of a snappy mood today.Redddogg (talk) 05:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. My cat is registered. Is he notable? This might merit mention in the Grayson article but that's it. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I looked on the Federal Elections Commission web site and couldn't find evidence that this is a registered political action committee as the article claims. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - An organization is considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources; the only coverage I can find is in the Wikipedia article itself, in a mirror of our Richard Grayson article, a blogspot post and a Yahoo groups message. The only 'reliable source' I have been able to uncover is in a book written by Grayson. ~ TheIntersect 05:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * redirect to Richard Grayson. Redirects are cheap. --dab (𒁳) 09:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment the redirect works for me. It could also go to Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, which may be more appropriate :-)  --Mr. Vernon (talk) 09:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article is largely irrelevant. Quantumobserver (talk) 17:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.