Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Council on the Ageing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KaisaL (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Council on the Ageing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Council_on_the_Ageing Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Local branch of a not necessarily notable organisation. Boleyn (talk) 06:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Not sure how much WP:BEFORE was done here.  Sorry, but I was probably a bit obtuse at Talk:Council on the Ageing.  Another simple example, if you google ("Council on the Ageing" .gov.au), then all of the .gov.au site hits are secondary, ie, the content has had review by people not associated with the subject here.  Yes, many of the hits in the gross search result are trivial, but there are a solid number that are not.  There is also the TROVE search I gave at "Talk:Council on the Ageing".  Again the bulk of that search result is not IRS about the subject, but there are a solid number that are.  I am of the view that each state branch (note state, not a "local"), probably does not warrant its own article, but as a multibranch national entity it seems to me to be quite notable.  Aoziwe (talk) 11:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep though the naming should be Council of the Ageing(NSW) or something similar as there is a national level body, and COTA bodies in every state. On Trove I found a significant volume sources including some that indicate the COTA is a publisher, research organisation, registered charity, and a primary source of knowledge. It meets WP:GNG the organisation and its work is well documented. Gnangarra 12:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - organisations in an state of australia such as these are long standing and notable... JarrahTree 12:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.