Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count Estruc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Veinor (talk to me) 17:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Count Estruc

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * →  See also : Count Estruc section on the Conflict of interest/Noticeboard.

No reliable sources? The book listed is a real book, though how important it is, I don't know. But there are no English language sources for this supposed vampire, and the ones in Spanish and French look tentative. Corvus cornix 23:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Sources # Tali Carreto, "Dossier Vampirismo" Revista Freek, Cádiz (20 de febrer 2006) --Estruch 06:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not relevant Corpx 23:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Angel Gordon, El gran libro de los vampiros, Morales y Torres editores, S.L ISBN 978-84-96106-49-9
 * 2) Miguel C. Aracil.Vampiros, mito y realidad de los no-muertos Editorial Edaf, S.A. ISBN: 8441412421


 * Do not Delete, please. --Estruch 12:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Google searches for '"Count Estruc" vampire -wikipedia' and '"Count Estruch" vampire -wikipedia' yielded precisely 2 (two) hits each.  — Athaenara 12:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Do not Delete. Add my vote against the deletion of an article we are not sure about its fiction. --Otermin 02:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment- You can read this discussion to get some background. MER-C 13:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Since I have been following the discussion at WP:COIN, this topic has begun to seem more and more unreal. The very late appearance of proposed sources in Spanish, that I can't check myself in a local library, doesn't sway me from a 'delete' verdict. The probable (though not admitted) COI disinclines me to trust further statements by the article creator. EdJohnston 16:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable and COI tainted. Jehochman  ☎ / ✔ 20:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Do not Delete, pleaseBokpasa 14:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Without prejudice to the AFD on the Catalan Wikipedia, the fact that sources for this article are only in Spanish suggest that this so-called legend (if notable at all) is definitely not notable outside Spain and therefore should not have an article on the English Wikipedia. A1octopus 17:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Additional comments

 * In catalan Wikipedia this article is now is being considered for deletion (like here), and in Spanish wiki is delete.--Britzingen 17:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Many strange. This user only speak about this question in all the wikis. Many strange. This user only speak about this question in all the wikis. — 62.57.217.118 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 18:32, May 15, 2007 (UTC) (UTC).


 * Yes, but you (User -62.57.217.118) speak about the same in all the wikis, but you don´t have name, only a IP. Why? Too easy, you are Salvador sainz, or a friend of Salvador sainz, and you try to promote for no deletion in Catalan wiki and I suppose that you try the same here. This is a deletion page, so don´t disturb and if you want to tell me something, go to my user page here, in Spanisw Wiki or in catalan Wiki. Is ok for you? And maybe, dear User -62.57.217.118, you need to see my user page and you can see that I have a lot of contributions in spanish wiki and not only about Count Estruch. Can you say the same? Oh, I don´t think so. Wikipedia is not a forum, never attack me in a deletion page or something similar.Thanks. --Britzingen 18:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't find such article as a deletable item. It worth to be included as a stub but as a legend it should and must be present in Wiki. Just my 2 cents. --Otermin 18:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem is, it may not be a real legend. The sources are very weak. We don't like to keep information in the encyclopedia that could be pure fiction. It would be better just to read the novel by Salvador Sainz. EdJohnston 20:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.