Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter-Measures (audio drama)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 19:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Counter-Measures (audio drama)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was a redirect to List of Doctor Who spin off audio plays by Big Finish, which still contains all of the info regarding the first spin-off, but existed for years poorly cited. Was prodded, but quickly de-prodded and moved to draft for improvement. However, it was moved back into mainspace without any improvement in sourcing. Searches were difficult due to the commonality of the name, but couldn't find enough to show it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Re-direct to List of Doctor Who spin off audio plays by Big Finish. There are no secondary sources cited, no evidence of notability, this shouldn't be an article. Bondegezou (talk) 15:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Redratify and possibly move protect. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 13:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems like Articles for deletion/Counter-Measures (audio drama) (2nd nomination) was accidentally created at the same time as this discussion. I've deleted the other page as a duplicate and in order to keep it free for any future deletion nomination. I've moved the sole !vote by over; in case you don't want it/want to change it, you can edit it here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect unless someone can find some good reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has been expanded upon past just basic episode tables, including production information and reviews from multiple secondary sources. Do the recent updates satisfy your requirements, ? -- / Alex /21  05:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing some work on the article. Most of those sources are either not independent or fail WP:RS (lots of blogs). I'd only count gamesradar and Starburst as meeting WP:RS. WP:GNG is usually interpreted to mean we need three RS about something. So I feel this still fails WP:GNG and would be better merged back into List of Doctor Who spin off audio plays by Big Finish. Bondegezou (talk) 10:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * And RadioTimes? That's been considered a very reliable source for years, and is currently used in over 4,000 articles. -- / Alex /21  11:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You are right about the Radio Times. (Apologies: I had misunderstood how that citation was being used here.) That's three reliable sources, so it meets minimum WP:GNG. I think redirect to List of Doctor Who spin off audio plays by Big Finish would still be a neater way of covering the content (that content that can be reliably sourced). But you can read that as a "weak re-direct" given the improvements. Bondegezou (talk) 11:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 12:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep moved from redirect to keep as the article has been significantly improved with additional referenced content with reviews and coverage in multiple sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 14:42, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.