Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter-Strike culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 01:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Counter-Strike culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

unencyclopedic, non notable, completely unsourced, and everything important is already duplicated in the related articles for counterstrike, and the professional gaming stuff is duplicates of the CAL article and the individual notable teams. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    On Belay!  00:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm not sure about it being non-notable, but it is unsourced and redundant to the other articles. --Cremepuff222  ( talk,  review me! ) 01:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep - Only if article is sourced soon. Otherwise delete per nom.-- Bryson { Talk } { Edits } 03:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced. &mdash; Deckiller 03:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless reliable secondary sources are applied, calling it a culture, it's WP:OR.  M URGH   disc.  12:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless it can be well sourced from nontrivial sources. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge merge with the appropriate articles if possible, then delete. P.B. Pilhet  21:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into the Counter Strike article or delete it. Kyriakos 01:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete-The mentioning of only a few players/teams shows it's biasness, plus very single mindedness approach to the writing.Mastrchf91 02:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Mastrchf91: exactly, and those couple of major teams that actually warrant wikipedia articles have them, or are referenced in the league's articles. This isn't the appropriate page for discussion of them. &rArr;    SWAT Jester    On Belay!  03:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete due to total lack of sources. See WP:A. If there were sources, I would support a merge to Counter-Strike. Stifle (talk) 17:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Much seems to be original research. A merge of any sourceable stuff would be appropriate, if the information isn't already in the main article.  Wickethewok 00:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I can fidn nothing that isn't original research that isn't already in the main article. I suspect that at some point someone will write about the counterstrike culture in a sociology journal or something similar and we can reconsider havign an article about the subject then. JoshuaZ 15:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't like it, it's crufty. Clearly not worth merging.--WaltCip 10:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Pro crast in a tor 01:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.