Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counternoobs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was PWN3D. Mailer Diablo 15:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Counternoobs
Neologism; original author removed Prod tag Rklawton 02:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Eh, more neologisms? Delete it please. ~Kylu ( u | t )  02:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete author can't seem to settle on a basic meaning. Danny Lilithborne 03:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Results 1 - 10 of about 71 for counternoobs..-- Andeh 03:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Kalani  [talk] 03:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, trying to be a dicdef, only there's no definition. "surveys show that the word is just bizzare" (bizarre, too) Shenme 03:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism -- the reason it isn't often found in normal conversation. TedTalk/Contributions 03:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nominations. *~Daniel~* ☎ 03:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete very few google hits. -- Emc² ( CONTACT ME ) 03:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Frag, non-notable neologism. Almost patent nonsense. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 06:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That's a new one on me. Can I use it to?  Rklawton 03:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense. Alphachimp   talk  07:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * De1337 \/\/P:N3Ω ~ trialsanderrors 07:10, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Knew those pesky online games would be involved. --DaveG12345 10:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. -- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 13:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - just straight up non-nescessary --Chiyocide 15:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism -- Alias Flood 16:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. G . H  e  19:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above. Targetter 20:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, just repeating my PROD rationale here: "Bizarre mess involving a neologism netting 74 google hits... and some websites... or maybe both? Yep, messy. Both sites seem to fail WP:WEB." Doesn't seem to have improved a single bit since PRODding... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.