Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counterpartivity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. --Joann e B 14:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Counterpartivity
WP:NOT something made up in school one day. Zero google hits for the term. Fluit 02:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for patent nonsense and original research. --Lakhim 02:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete before someone else will discover the genius of the author. Jadriaen 02:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * speedy delete. Hoax and absurdity, must've been a slow day in chemistry class. Begone.--cjllw | TALK  03:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete This is the truth, and we have serious followers. Please leave it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thepieman (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy Delete per nom--Nick Y. 03:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per cjllw --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   04:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It is at far too early a stage of development at the moment, but do say hi from Wikipedia to Mr Lutman and Mr Krey. Tyrenius 04:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research, made up in school one day. J I P  | Talk 08:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DarthVad e r 13:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.