Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counterparts Lite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  Hut 8.5  21:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Counterparts Lite

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable; no reliable coverage whatsoever. — Esquivalience (talk) 03:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up blog entries and incidental mentions, but no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  16:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable and not even a stub; two sentences; promotion with link to try it out. Kierzek (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google search turns up string editing app by Michel Fortin created around 26 May 2014; Twitter post says Fortin added support for XLIFF 4 Jun 2014. No evidence that this application is widely used for translation/localization (the purpose of XLIFF); but see blogger using CPL. I suspect that translation systems would internally support string editing (that's what translation is all about). Some posts suggest CPL is one of many editors used by non-professionals; see comment "But many need a tool for John Doe the unknown student translator on fiverr. For sure the large 10x as expensive professional translating companies already support it. – Lothar Aug 13 '15". I'm not seeing any secondary sources that tout the app. Current content sounds in advertising and need not be saved in a redirect. I'm not seeing WP:DUE for the XLIFF article, so I deleted the WL there. Glrx (talk) 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.