Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counterpunch (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spellcast (talk) 12:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Counterpunch (book)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not assert notability. As an aside, the article has also been unreferenced since November 2007 -- JediLofty UserTalk 09:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, but obviously fix. If it is accurate, it has info of historical importance and should not be dissed with "does not assert notability". Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 09:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 23:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - apparent original research. B.Wind (talk) 04:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.