Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countervandal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was unanimous delete, ignoring the joke vote. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 10:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Countervandal
No relevant information except self reference → Aza Toth 20:40, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. At the least, a non-notable neologism. --Kinu 21:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism and (at best) unencyclopedic Wikipedia insider jargon. MCB 07:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The evolution of language must be proliferated - isn't that a goal of the WikiFactus project? The Fish 21:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ASR. Stifle 00:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or, if thought sensible, transwiki to Wiktionary. There is already a vandal definition in Wiktionary, so probably delete. haz (user talk) e   


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.