Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countess Victoria Bernstorff-Gyldensteen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  10:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Countess Victoria Bernstorff-Gyldensteen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unimportant notablity with little to no information that violates WP:NBIO. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk) 03:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, Denmark,  and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * delete I could find only a single source that had more to say than what it says here, and that was the capsule bio from one of the charities she sponsors. Other than that there was some fussing among royal jewel watchers about how one of her tiaras was worn by Carina Axelsson. Her husband only appears in the Danish WP, and is tagged for a lack of citations; about the only thing I found out about him was that they are using drones to count pumpkins on one of his properties in order to manage the crop better. They seem to be pretty peripheral nobility. Mangoe (talk) 03:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.