Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countin' Money


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Trill OG. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  19:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Countin' Money

 * – ( View AfD View log )

After a bit of research, I believe this fails the notability guidelines for music (songs, specifically). SarahStierch (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * After researching, I believe this article should be kept because this song was released on a major label, on an album that charted highly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ParaguaneroSwag (talk • contribs) 18:18, 6 February 2012‎
 * Note that the above editor was the originator of the article. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Trill OG per WP:NSONGS. Notability isn't inherited. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  05:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect as per above. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Trill OG - these three blurbs offer some coverage, but I'm not completely convinced there's enough here to warrant an individual article. Per WP:NSONGS: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album..." so a redirect seems reasonable.  Gongshow  Talk 05:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Trill OG as above. No particular claim to fame; author is free to merge any salvageable materials into the parent article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.