Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Squire Diner-Restaurant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Country Squire Diner-Restaurant

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced; quick source search came up with nothing. Also, non-notable, and most certainly fails notability guidelines for business entities  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  17:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per criteria A7. Importance/notability not asserted.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

 Procedural keep  you can't have a speedy deletion template and an AfD at once.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually you can. Happens fairly regularly. -DJSasso (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Really? Where is that written? That's news to me.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Does not come close to meeting criteria A7. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note, I added some sourcing from the Philadelphia Inquirer so it is no longer unsourced.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, you know I think this little place has to be given a chance to meet the GNG and it's not a contentious or unverified subject if not we should consider merging it toBroomall, Pennsylvania.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Both of the links go to a site called "Dealyo" which looks to be like a Groupon type of site. Not sure how those links add any notability. Also, you already added a Keep earlier so a 2nd one wasn't necessary. Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't add a second one I changed my vote from "procedural keep" to simply "keep" and striking out the original one, admonishing me for that is unnecessary.LuciferWildCat (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete It does not appear to meet notability requirements: WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Peacock (talk) 20:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Two articles from the city paper do not add up to enough coverage. Drmies (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.