Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County of Urnst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Flanaess.  So Why  07:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

County of Urnst

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete this is one of many fictional subdivisions of fictional settings for D&D. It is trivial. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 04:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This page is in context of the Greyhawk world of Dungeons of Dragons, which Wikipedia has a nice chunk of information on already. I see no reason why I should favor delete over merging, considering that it is a more specific page on something that clearly IS notable.  Merge with Flanaess. Borderlandor (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete, unless third-party sources are forthcoming. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 05:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Flanaess. The article lacks even a single citation. Zero citations = WP:V FAIL = nothing to merge. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.