Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courage the Cowardly Dog (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete  --Anthony.bradbury"talk"  11:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Courage the Cowardly Dog (character)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Whilst he is the lead character of the show, there is never going to be enough for a whole article on him. The infobox itself demonstrates that as it is just the box for the show (which is notable) Ged UK (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * redirect There is no need to nominate this for deletion. If there is not enough content simply make it a redirect to the show. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per DJ Clayworth, although I recommend the list of characters (preferably his section) as the target.  Anturiaethwr  Talk  00:00, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. While I'm a huge fan of the show, this character is already adequately described in the above articles, and I'm not seeing enough evidence of separate notability to justify a stand-alone article. The only reason I'm saying delete instead of redirect is that this isn't a likely search term -- if people are looking for the character, they will type in Courage the Cowardly Dog and not add "(character)" to the search.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  16:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed with Fabrictramp, no way anyone will type it fully as it is there and it'd be creating a fairly unlikely redirect treelo  talk 02:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks reliable sources and doesn't establish independent notability and as such, is eligible for deletion. I also think this would be an unlikely search term. Seraphim&hearts;  Whipp  11:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I actually think it's a possible search term; I often use parentheses like that in searches when I think I'll get more than one result.  That said, I would agree that a redirect isn't critical, since there are no incoming links that aren't related to deletion.   Anturiaethwr  Talk  15:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable and unlikely search item. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.