Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Court Time Sports Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 04:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Court Time Sports Center

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable building that lacks "significant coverage by independent sources". All the hits in a google news archive search are trivial Corpx 16:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, Corpx, you seem to be on a number of these and I've been off Wikipedia for a few months, so just as a quick question, what sources count as trivial and don't? Thanks!  And yes, I think we should keep the article, because it is overal presented well, has a large number of diverse groups that use it, seems to be a good sized building, has a number of notable corporate sponsors, etc.  I agree, however, that more news style/article links should be added as well.  Have there been any incidents at the building that made the news that could increase notability?  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 16:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Trivial coverage is saying "Event x will happen at Court Time Sports Center @ 9:30PM". To be notable, an article must be about the Sports Center or mention it "significantly".   Corpx 16:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the reply. I'll see what I can find.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * keep. Trivia sections may be easily deleted without mushc fuss. Mukadderat 16:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Still doesnt prove notability though. Corpx 16:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see what makes it notable. Oysterguitarist 17:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: User:24.3.104.14 has just added a bunch of links showing where it appeared in the news. Regards, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * They're all trivial mentions though. No good. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 17:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, major claim to notability being a practice facility for a minor-league team is not persuasive. For comparison, I haven't written an article yet on my local ice arena, but it was a preferred practice facility for several Olympic skaters before the Pettit Center opened. That's at least a reasonable stab at notability. --Dhartung | Talk 23:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:N because of lack of reliable sources. I suspect that few or no such facilities are notable enough for inclusion in WP. Deor 01:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN facility. Greatest claim to notability is being the practice facility of a minor league sports team. Caknuck 14:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.