Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Court of Impeachment (South Korea)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Constitutional Court of Korea. There seems to be a general agreement that this doesn't warrant its own article. As the entire content in the article is limited to one sentence (and that too copied and modified from Constitutional Court of Korea), it seems fair to redirect it. Any subsequent content can be added to the appropriate section in the target article. This close is without prejudice to creating a standalone article, should enough references be found in the future and should there be enough content to justify a split from Constitutional Court of Korea. (non-admin closure) Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Court of Impeachment (South Korea)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article consists of the introduction line of Constitutional Court of Korea changed to past tense. According to Constitutional_Court_of_Korea the Constitutional Court of Korea rules on impeachments as outlined by the constitution. I cannot find a single reference to this supposed court anywhere on Google and I believe it could be made up. Laurdecl talk 01:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It's mentioned here and there's a doopedia article about it so it's not made up. Siuenti (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So it did exist, but I don't believe it warrants its own article. It could at best be one or two sentences in the History subsection of Constitutional Court of Korea explaining the former name of the Court. The article as it stands is literally a direct copy of the Consitutional article intro with the words changed to past tense. Laurdecl talk 02:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Soft delete let's pretend it was WP:PRODded, if someone wants to bring it back with references then think again. Siuenti (talk) 10:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Constitutional Court of Korea, the apparent successor court. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.