Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courthouse, Tacna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 15:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Courthouse, Tacna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This completely unsourced article documents something of only local interest. If the Tacna courthouse is worth documenting, it could be better done in the article on Tacna. ubiquity (talk) 20:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - the article clearly states that it the seat of an agreement of national importance. It now has res, ibox, cats etc Victuallers (talk) 23:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I can understand the nom's dislike for this article in the state during the start of AfD, but AfDing of an article that claims such historic significance in only about an hour is not the best way of dealing with such articles.. The historic location where the treaty to transfer a region from one country to another was finalized has great interest to not only both entire nations, but to historians in general.  I liken this to Campo de Cahuenga where the Treaty of Cahuenga was signed.  Just as historic, but sources are much more easily available to English WP editors.--Oakshade (talk) 04:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve it. There's plenty of info, in addition to what has been done above, to establish notaiblity StarM 03:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.