Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courthouse in Września


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Withdrawn by nominator. Editors interested in changing the article's title can discuss a page move on the article talk page or just be BOLD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Courthouse in Września

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deprodded recently (prod by User:Lectonar, deprod by User:Djflem). I've started an AfD on pl wiki (pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:10:24:Gmach sądu we Wrześni). My BEFORE does not suggest this effectively unreferenced building (our article links to a photo, pl links to the Couthouse page) is notable or has a status of a heritage monument (note: it is next to a prison building that has such a status, but that building does not yet have an article on pl or en, so no merger is possible). While it is good to monitor the pl wiki discussion for possible keep arguments, I think we should discuss things here as well. (A note for clarity: pl wiki article is about the building, not the court; our article is a substub that doesn't even make its focus clear, but I don't think local courts at that level are inherently notable, either. FYI the building hosts a local district court (Poland) office). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Poland. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. While it's true that it doesn't appear to be heritage listed, I think that a significant public building like this dating from 1906 should be considered notable. Rename to Września Courthouse though, which is much more intuitive English. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Commment. I see that Panek has said in the parallel discussion on Polish Wikipedia "Jest w wojewódzkiej ewidencji zabytków. Ma białą kartę, którą pewnie dałoby się to i owo uźródłowić" ("It is in the provincial register of monuments. It has a white card that could probably be used to renew certain things"). I don't know the significance of the provincial register of monuments, or a white card, however. BD2412  T 18:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing. Being listed as a zabytek at the provincial (voivideship) scale ([:pl:Wojewódzka_ewidencja_zabytków]]) seems sufficient, particularly given that this document has several paragraphs of coverage describing the building, its architectural style, interior, etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.