Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Burke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There are two arguments here; a) she doesn't meet NHOCKEY and b) she meets GNG. The arguments favor the latter and I tend to agree - the consensus is to keep but there is no prejudice against a future renomination if the editors remain dissatisfied with the condition of the article. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   00:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Courtney Burke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NHOCKEY JMHamo (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    00:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    00:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    00:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Presently fails WP:NHOCKEY, and not enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Perhaps this is WP:TOOSOON. — Jkudlick t c s 12:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Article needs expansion and clean-up per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * But how is GNG meet? JMHamo (talk) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep: NHOCKEY accords no presumptive notability to women players. That being said, the available sources do clear the GNG, if barely.   Ravenswing   04:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It actually does if she played in the Olympics or World Championships. However, it looks like she only did at the junior level so it would fall to GNG which it does look like she meets so Keep. -DJSasso (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - multiple independent sources with detailed coverage. GNG met. RonSigPi (talk) 04:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.