Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Buses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, withdrawn. (non-admin closure) SK2242 (talk) 19:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Courtney Buses

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage outside local news - fails WP:NCORP. Endorsing redirect to Reading Buses - relevant content is already in the target article. SK2242 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Mentions in half a dozen local publications, two industry services (including a feature article) and one national newspaper. Easily passes notability threshold. Oppose merge, relevant content is not already in the target article. Lilporchy (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Significant coverage, not mentions are necessary. SK2242 (talk) 13:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Agree with above keep arguments. there is enough here to meet notability. Expertwikiguy (talk) 02:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately all evidence points to the contrary. There needs to be significant coverage (not mentions, which Lilporchy bases their argument on), from multiple reliable sources, and at least one of those should not be local or of limited interest to satisfy WP:AUD, a component of NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 04:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

- Meets SIGCOV & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per some of the sources in article as well as these:


 * Thank you for taking the time to find sources. SK2242 (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.