Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Niemiec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Courtney Niemiec

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

American former soccer player who made 27 21 career club appearances before retiring. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 01:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football,  and Pennsylvania. JTtheOG (talk) 01:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. WCM email 07:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet WP:GNG, with a complete lack of secondary sources. Let'srun (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note when searching for sources that her name is now Courtney Tole per her current employer. -Socccc (talk) 22:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The Oregonian ran a short feature on her going from undrafted to starter in 2014, as did CBS News Philly/KYW Newsradio; unclear if that's enough. The rest I could find were more clearly not SIGCOV. The club appearances count was also wrong (21, not 27). Also added detail about her post-retirement move to coaching and changed her name. -Socccc (talk) 23:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep -, , Per Soccc. Has sources like , , and , made 27+ appearances in the NWSL, regarded as one of best women's league in world... Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Due to sources listed by Das osmnezz. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 09:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG and WP:HEY, per sources highlighted within this discussion which are now cited in the article. Kudos to for improving the article which is in much better shape than when it was first nominated for deletion. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources provided by Socccc and Das osmnezz, enough to meet WP:GNG. S.A. Julio (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I think there's just enough coverage in The Oregonian and CBS New Philadelphia pieces to suggest WP:GNG can be met here. Jogurney (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.