Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cousin Joey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Cousin Joey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The movie was never realized and was never permitted to be posted on the wikipedia site. The information given is untrue and needs to be taken down for copyright reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santedorazio (talk • contribs) 15:43, 26 April 2011


 * Please tag your post using four ~ signs (~) . Also, nothing in the article seems to fall under copyright. There are no links to places where the film is available online, nothing but basic plot information. Per No Legal Threats, it is not a good idea to threaten or imply legal action against something on Wikipedia; it is a blockable offence.
 * However, I must agree that this article may not fulfill Notability. A quick Google search shows only the IMDB and Wikipedia entries for this film, and then ten or twenty sites that claim to stream it. As such, Delete. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Barebones entry at IMDb, but nothing else found in a brief online search, not even a link to a home media release. According to nom (who may, by their username, have WP:COI issues), there wasn't even a theatrical release...this is not verifiable, but the glaring lack of material supporting even the movie's existence argues for deletion. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 16:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Netflix doesn't seem to have heard of this movie. There is a very short entry in IMDB, but is this a hoax? I don't think that the copyright reasons stated by the nominator apply, but nor does the No Legal Threats response to that. But still delete.Dingo1729 (talk) 16:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of a copyvio as claimed in the nom; but clearly fails WP:N and WP:NF. Via Google, I was able to locate several sites with trivial listings of the director and cast, but unable to locate any support for plot synopsis or even evidence of theatrical release.  The nom (who per  may be the claimed director of the film), appears to be confirming above that the film was never completed and/or released.  Given lack of any significant coverage - delete. --- Barek (talk) - 16:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, not a copyvio in the sense the nominating editor is suggesting but the text is still a word-for-word copy of its IMDB entry. Even if the article was re-phrased it would still not meet our notability guidelines for films and as such should be removed. doom gaze   (talk)  22:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.