Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coventry House Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Coventry House Publishing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable publishing house. Speedy deletion tag removed by IP editor. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - My rebuttal would be that because Coventry House Publishing is comprised of authors, and two of those authors are notable beyond refute as part of Wikipedia (Burke Badenhop, Jake Anderson) then Coventry House Publishing is therefore notable, too. Two notable authors who share a common publishing house thereby make that publishing house notable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pubwriter112 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't see any substantial coverage of this company. Their website claims they currently have 18 books for sale including such titles as "Introduction to Conducting Private Investigations" and "How to Really Win or Lose a Guy in Ten Days", so they're not one of the biggest firms and not specialising in the areas that get critical attention, but they would still be notable if anyone had written about them. Having two notable authors (who aren't exactly Stephen King and seem to be mainly famous for other things) doesn't in itself make you notable: see WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:GNG. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete No independent sources, no WP:GNG, WP:NOTINHERITED, no keepy. Also it's an interesting coincidence that the same editor wrote an article on Philip Becnel and his publisher.  Some might even say it looked like a PR firm was hired by one or the other to write wikipages for them...   Sailsbystars (talk) 03:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.