Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cover Wallet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Cover Wallet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for non-notable Insurance agency that sells insurance, not an insurance company that provides insurance. The refs are the usual mentions and notes and press releases. Awards are trivial, or one of many in a listing.  DGG ( talk ) 10:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:40, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep
 * Cover Wallet is not an insurance agency but part of insurtech companies which are introducing a new way to get insurance online. please check here if you dont know about insurtech [here] & Financial technology. HmmNinja (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Coverwallet was called the best fintech solution in 2017. HmmNinja (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. The references are poor: two are to the firm's PR; the Forbes and Inc. items are brief mentions of individuals at the firm. Nor do the Entrepreneur listing and the Benzinga Global FinTech Award appear distinctly notable. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep
 * Benigna it's not a mass media, it's an online magazine specializes in investors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.186.65.56 (talk • contribs)
 * Whether Benzinga aims for a mass or a specialist audience is not really relevant: there is no automatic notability inherited for its awards and their recipients. Also, if this IP is the same person as the editor who used the same format when responding to User DGG above, you should not be providing a "Keep" opinion twice. AllyD (talk) 20:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPIP. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Wikipedia is not a marketing or advocacy platform. -- HighKing ++ 16:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.