Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covisint


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No reason has been offered to delete the article; deficiencies identified are problems that can be resolved through regular editing. Skomorokh 14:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Covisint

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is advertising with no connection to other parts of wikipedia. Bonglander (talk) 11:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment the article needs a total revamp and a good scrubbing to remove the promotional tone. It seems to be well known in the auto industry. Ohconfucius (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep and totally overhaul. You can tell when articles were written by marketers as it's impossible to tell what the bloody organisation actually does. As far as I can fathom it allows car companies to talk to each other and sell things to each other online, or in jargon it's an "automotive eMarketplace", or a "B2B online exchange". It seems it started off as a supposedly neutral auction site after wranglings about whether it broke anti-trust laws, took forever to get a CEO, then got bought, thought about and balked at an IPO, and finally went into the online healthcare business. After wading through the churnalism that passes for journalism in the business world, here's some articles about Covisint: Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  — Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but clean up -- This sounds like a notable company, but it is an extremely spammy article, and full of abbreviations and jargon that mean nothing to the general reader. I have just given it a valid category and removed the "locations" section, which is better dealt with by using a link to the company website, which will certainly be maintained.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.