Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cox gas engine toys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merged with Cox Models.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   17:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Cox gas engine toys
Pretty much invisible per the Google test, no evidence of sales numbers or anything else per WP:CORP, no sign of any reliable sources or significant third-party coverage Just zis Guy you know? 16:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Did you try "Cox" and ".049"? About 332,000 Google hits.  Cox gas engine toys were on every storeshelf from Wal-Mart to K-Mart and of course in all hobby stores when I was a kid.  I owned several model cars and airplanes that used engines as small as .010 and as large as .35.  Mugaliens 17:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  01:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - At the time of writing there are over a hundred Cox 049s for sale on eBay so they seem perfectly collectable. Factual articles on historic collectable toys are entirely encyclopaedic. BlueValour 02:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the two comments above. --Daniel Olsen 03:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Cox Models same topic much more complete. Dimitrii 03:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect with Cox Models, as these are absolutely cultural touchstones for a large (physically, at least) segment of the population (look for the self-tinting glasses and walrus moustaches). Geogre 12:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge —  with Cox Models as per above. -- moe .RON   talk  00:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.