Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coxs Creek (Belfield, New South Wales)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep   Yash  t  101   09:01, 9 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Coxs Creek (Belfield, New South Wales)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Considering its short length and its description as a storm drain, it's hard to see how this could be notable D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  04:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep but perhaps merge into Cooks River. I am guessing it wasn't originally a storm drain but rather a natural watercourse that has been "improved" by concreting it over. I reckon sources could be found if someone was interested in looking. In the short term a merge and redirect to Cooks River may be the best course of action. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 00:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep some work and it is much improved. I'd go further but my net connection is a bit 20th century. There seems ample written about it for a good article on it separate from the main river. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - the Green and Golden Bell Frog issue makes it pretty notable - this is a high-profile endangered species. Funny, we were talking about this on an environmental excursion today. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per commenters above. --99of9 (talk) 01:20, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.