Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cozi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —  The Earwig   talk 06:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Cozi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article with a GNG sourcing tag since 2017. Coverage is either transactions or passing mentions; the CNN link is a very short and insubstantial piece. No evidence that this meets WP:GNG. FalconK (talk) 06:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 06:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The review includes criticism of Cozi: "My one and only complain is with the calendar, which offers only a scrolling day-by-day view. It works well enough, but I'd really like some list-view options that would show only upcoming events--and allow me to filter them by person. A month view would be nice, too."  The review includes criticism and praise of Cozi: "The online journal isn't the prettiest looking service, but it's the content your family and friends are going to be interested in, and Cozi certainly delivers the functionality that shares it."  The review includes criticism of Cozi: "While Cozi offers a few desirable features and services, it doesn't implement any of them well. Its worst offense is that every family member uses the same password to log into the system. Cozi recognizes all the email addresses of family members as user names, but one password is reused for all of them. From a security standpoint, that one reason is enough to not use Cozi. ... The Web app also skips large swathes of family management entirely. For example, it doesn't contain much in terms of document management, nor any financial planning and monitoring tools. The amount of information you can add about each family member is extremely limited as well."  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Cozi to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 06:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)</li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 22:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Cunard. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. jp×g 06:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure this needed to be relisted. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cunard. WP:GNG are met.Less Unless (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.