Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cozy English School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 04:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Cozy English School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A 72 student English school in China may be cozy, but is hardly notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It does sound nice, but still only a small business. BigJim707 (talk) 23:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, check out WP:ORG. totally not notable, reporting in secondary sources would help but there's no indication that there's anything note-worthy in the first place. It exists, so what. - Metal lunchbox (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable "school", promotional article. Keb25 (talk) 12:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Creator is confusing Wikipedia with the Yellow Pages or a trade directory. Fails WP:ORG and is WP:ARTSPAM for a typical high street cram school for languages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a single reference to an outside source; very far from the "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" that is required by WP:ORG. Therefore clearly fails notability. Google search for the school's Chinese name ("凯奇英语学校") yields only one result, to a bilingual site similar to the school's website. A clear delete. Madalibi (talk) 09:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: small size, speciality school, no showing of notability and no reason to reasonable expect otherwise.--Milowent • talkblp-r 03:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.