Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackbaby United Football Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Tone 22:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Crackbaby United Football Club

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable club Kevin McE (talk) 10:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Kevin McE (talk) 10:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable. A club that doesn't actually play in a league? Get rid of it! GiantSnowman 10:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing a club by this name heading to the Premiership anytime soon, much less a beer league.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 11:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - you couldn't make it up, ... or perhaps you could.  --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 11:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - just a bunch of mates having a social kickabout, not notable at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, it doesn't violate WP:PORNBIO but that's about the only positive thing I can say about this. Thryduulf (talk) 12:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- clearly NN since they are not even in the most minor league. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete WP:CSD, no indication of importance or significance. Already speedied once under this name and once as Crakbaby United Football Club. JohnCD (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * comment This is substantially identical to the article previously deleted under this title, but it has significantly more content than that deleted under the other title you mention. Thryduulf (talk) 14:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no indication of importance or significance. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Blatant hoax. – PeeJay 17:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.