Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackerjack Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fremantle Australia. Drmies (talk) 01:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Crackerjack Productions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable defunct company; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:ORG / WP:GNG. The many series produced are themselves notable, but Australian division of larger company does not currently merit separate page. Only mentions of the company in news sources, not significant coverage. Moreover, 2002 lawsuit does not meet Wikipedia notability standards. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Fremantle Australia, its superceding organisation. Not notable in its own right but it is a likely search term and does deserve some due weight content.  Aoziwe (talk) 11:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fremantle Australia, as per Aoziwe, the organisation it s non-notable in its own right, even the 2002 lawsuit which failing to meet the notability standards. Sheldybett (talk) 00:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I can find some sources, but probably not enough to meet WP:ORGCRIT. I think that its founders, Mark and Carl Fennessy, probably are notable, with a long article about them in the Financial Review in 2017, and other articles I found on Trove but haven't seen yet - in the Australasian Business Intelligence in 2010, 'Creative pair shine through at local launch' and again in 2011 'Chance for brothers to shine overseas' ; in Inside Film: If in 2008, 'Take Two: Mark and Carl' ; and they're included in the Sydney Morning Herald 's 2015 'The Big 30: Australian television's power brokers, innovators and influencers' , etc. So, ideally I would probably say merge Crackerjack Productions to Mark and Carl Fennessy - when someone writes that article. Fremantle Australia is a possible merger target for now - although that article has been tagged for reliance on primary sources and being written like an ad for some years, and gives undue weight to Grundy. Having a section on Crackerjack in the Fremantle Australia article would probably help to balance it. (I haven't checked journal databases yet for Crackerjack Productions, so if I find more sources, I will come back.) RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Fremantle Australia Sparebug (talk) 00:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.