Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackerquiddick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Probably should have gone to RfD, but a pretty uncontroversial deletion.-- Kubigula (talk) 18:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Crackerquiddick

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Meaningless redirect. Clubjuggle T / C  20:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The redirect isn't entirely meaningless, as the term has been used by a few bloggers to refer to an incident in the campaign. However, the article this redirects to doesn't use the term to discuss the incident, so the redirect isn't helpful to readers. There are just 101 ghits and 0 gnews hits; looks like the term has run its course and won't be staying long. -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be a neologism, possibly coined by (and used most notably by) Hot Air blog in reference to a criticism of Barack Obama by Ed Rendell. --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 22:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable noeologism. Even if used now, who is going to search for this in the future?Yobmod (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.