Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackers the Corporate Crime Fighting Chicken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Crackers the Corporate Crime Fighting Chicken

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable character that appeared in 2 Michael Moore projects. Any reliable coverage, if it exists, is in passing or in relation to TV Nation or The Awful Truth. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - Below are some sources. North America1000 04:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * – At least two paragraphs . It's clear that the subject continues on the next page, but I cannot access it.
 * – At least two paragraphs . It's clear that the subject continues on the next page, but I cannot access it.
 * – Two paragraphs
 * – Six paragraphs, although a couple are shorter paragraphs.
 * – Six paragraphs, although a couple are shorter paragraphs.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. While I expected to vote delete at first, sources presented above suggest notability. I can't access all of them, but I read the 3-4 pages in Schultz and that's seems to meet SIGCOV. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, in accordance with NA's sources. I also went through some of the google books results, and they discuss this character in more than passing.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 06:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per reasoning provided by other editors who precede me. Haleth (talk) 12:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.