Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackhead Bob

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Merge and redirect 4 / Weak Delete 1 / Keep 2: Merge and redirect. -- AllyUnion (talk) 02:48, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Crackhead Bob
(Same reasons as above listings) At the request of User:Alkivar, I looked through the personalities listed at Howard Stern and, after looking at the article and doing a bit of research, I don't think that this person warrants an individual article. Simply appearing on the The Howard Stern Show does not mean a person is relevant or particularly notable. --Slowking Man 07:54, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Merge into The Wack Pack and redirect if this is all there is to be said about him. Otherwise this will be a forever-stubby article. --TenOfAllTrades 18:35, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Reminds me of my old college friend Crackpipe Dan. I wonder what became of him. Anwyay, redirect to The Wack Pack. And note that the VfD tag was removed by the article's creator (I restored it). -R. fiend 18:42, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * like it or not but the stern show has over 20 million listeners a day and as stupid as these guys may seem to you they really have quite a fanbase and following. they arent just people who come on the show once a year but they are central to many of the shows bits and have been parts of some of the most innovative radio of the last 20 years. as far as the wack pack not being notable just because they only appear on the howard stern (they actually alos travel the country and make paid personal appearances) you cant just dismiss someones reason for notoriety just because you're personally not a fan of it. thats like saying that Tom Brady isnt relevant because he only plays football. Xpendersx
 * Weak Delete, not notable enough. Megan1967 02:33, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Howard_Stern and redirect, as per my above vote on KC Armstrong. --Deathphoenix 04:09, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Sterncruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 13:03, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, Redirect as indicated above. &mdash; Stevie is the man!  Talk 08:43, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, Redirect Good idea guys! I have heard of crackhead bob before, however, he is surely not notable enough for his own wikipedia search.  Definitely merge with Howard Stern and ROCK ON!!!  User:Mamasita
 * Comment: This vote by a new user whose only contributions so far have been to VfD discussions and who was accused in a prior VfD discussion of being a sockpuppet.
 * Keep. For same reasons given in all of the other ones.  This agenda-pushing campaign is getting tiresome.  Bacchiad 02:40, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I am voting keep despite the fact that someone may be angry when they don't find 'Crackhead Bob the Great' of Navarra on this page. --Ahmed Stephens 04:14, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)