Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackle (physics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  07:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Crackle (physics)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of actual usage in physics, only exists for humor. Contested prod. ANDROS1337  02:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep A bit of looking and I found this preprint which uses crackle. It was later published in Classical and Quantum Gravity. Gruntler (talk) 05:54, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: this is different from the paper already cited in the article. The authors are different and come from different universities. Gruntler (talk) 07:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * One Some more: stellar dynamics conference proceeding and associated paper using crackle heavily (in the title even). A robotics paper mentioning crackle . This neurophysiology paper  deals heavily with crackle, as does this one . Gruntler (talk) 21:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Tentative Delete. If sources can be added demonstrating this term is actually used or notable, I'll say keep. But for now the article just links two papers by the same author and a usenet faq--that doesn't cut it. Yilloslime T C  07:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep That the other use is from another research group is evidence favoring notability, not impairing it. It's   what is necessary to show the term has been adopted .    DGG ( talk ) 22:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per User DGG. Several examples of its use exist. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.