Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cracky-chan

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 02:42, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

Cracky-chan
Content probably not noteworthy and non-enyclopaedic. I wrote the page, but only to stop the constant "vandalism" (is it even possible to vandalize a page with no content?) and reverts/undeletes. But then, it wasn't really a candidate for speedy deletion anymore, so now I'm listing it here. Grm wnr 23:41, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Totally non-encyclopaedic. Delete.Zantastik 23:47, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless evidence of notability is given in article. Tuf-Kat 23:48, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not remotely notable, magnet for vandalism. This "meme" has existed for approximately 48 hours, if that long, and is only of interest to the denizens of 4chan's /b/ (random images) forum, all of whom already know all there is to know about it (which isn't much). As they say on /b/, kill it with fire!   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 23:49, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete once the hype cools down. In the extremely unlikely event of this becoming noteworthy, merge with imageboard --Grm wnr 23:53, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * delete again (this thing has been speedy deleted at least 4 times in it's previous versions)Geni 00:53, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Just keep speedying it as a recreate amd be done with it. I'm sure they'll forget about it in a few...days, perhaps hours. hfool/Roast me 03:42, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Prior speedy deletes may not be used as a justification to "speedy delete as recreated content".  Let it go through the full VfD discussion.  (no vote)  Rossami (talk) 05:55, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Hi, I'm a 4chan administrator. I'm sorry these silly kids have been messing around with Wikipedia again. I thought they would learn their lesson when 4chan was merged->Imageboard... oh, well. Ashibaka tlk 06:35, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * One does not simply meme their way into deletion -- Bobdoe (Talk) 08:33, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, then flog, hang, quarter, immolate and desecrate the article's remains even further. :: DarkLordSeth 17:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. Edeans 05:04, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and delete requested by the author. Keeping it won't add value to WP. --Deathphoenix 03:17, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;tregoweth 03:16, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Delete the article but append it to the main 4chan article, where the information should be in the first place. Kitsune Sniper

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.