Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cradle-to-cradle design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit  14:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Cradle-to-cradle design

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Vast amount of unsourced content, possible OR in some parts. RGW- and appeal to nature-toned. Needs academic citations. Very little improvement over the years. Unsuitable as a reader-facing article. Janhrach (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  14:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and Environment. Janhrach (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Has plenty of quality sources and concept seems to have attracted attention in the business and sustainability press (as per cited sources). The article does need a lot of work.  Jargon and green woo-woo need to be toned down a notch, and unsourced sections should probably be cut.  But there's a worthy article behind all the clutter. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.