Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craftsman-Farmer Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Luigi Carbonari. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Craftsman-Farmer Alliance

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Page written in just three lines and with a single source (concerning the electoral results of the regional elections in Trentino-Alto Adige). In 1964 the list obtained 2.6% of the vote and one seat in the Province of Trento, except for this information and its poor result in 1968 we know practically nothing else about it. It doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - had regional assembly representation, which should suffice considering the autonomy of the region. --Soman (talk) 22:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:NORG makes it clear that just because a political party has held seats in parliament does not automatically confer notable (WP:ORGSIG). It does increase the chance that the party will meet WP:GNG, but at this point, the onus is on you to provide sourcing that shows this. Curbon7 (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Effectively it is so, this list does not go beyond that electoral result and the election of a regional councilor...--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics,  and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Given that the party only existed because of the efforts of a former DC politician, Luigi Carbonari (politico), it might be that a redirect to him would be most appropriate. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 09:59, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. A political party which obtained one elect in a regional election and was represented for four years in a Regional Council deserves an article. The main topic should be the party, not the politician, but, if regrettably there is no consensus on keeping the article, I hope we can at least create an article on Luigi Carbonari (the party's leader, who was a member of the Italian Parliament before) and merge it into the new article. --Checco (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment A party deserves an article if it respects WP:GNG and there is something to tell about it. On this party, excluding the electoral result, there is practically nothing to say. I agree with Goldsztajn's proposal, ie merge it with the party leader's page: in the next few days I will create an article about Luigi Carbonari. A redirect to a broader page in this case can be very useful, while a three-line article is not necessary. --Scia Della Cometa (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The article's been created already. :) Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Perfect! ;) --Scia Della Cometa (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep, for now, ideally with expanded references. Merging with the party leader's page should be a fall-back option.--Autospark (talk) 15:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge with Luigi Carbonari: After thinking about this one for a few days, there is just nothing here. This is a fairly minor party that existed for a short period of time, so it's no surprise that coverage is practically non-existent. Merging with Carbonari's article will still preserve the history of the party, but will do so in a better venue, so I think that is the best option in the current light. Curbon7 (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.