Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Bernard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  No consensus . (non-admin closure) Jax 0677 (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Craig Bernard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No demonstration of notability. Doubtful notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Likely promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete no indications of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Original article was poorly written, sourced, and verified. I have cleaned up the page to include non-promotional biography, reliable sources with independent in-depth coverage, and proof of notability due to multiple international awards and a career directing and producing for multiple high profile people. The person is also a notable figure in virtual reality production. Multiple indications of notability. I strongly recommend this page be kept now that it is in line with Wikipedia guidelines and requirements. This person is also referenced in multiple Wikipedia articles of notable people and works. Amandadoyle543 (talk) 12:00 PM, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Reiteration of strongly recommended to keep. (See comment in original discussion - thank you) Additional edits have since been made by other editors to ensure neutrality, accuracy, and notability. It is now in excellent shape. Amandadoyle543 (talk) 12:24 AM, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.