Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Boddington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Craig Boddington

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem particularly notable. Sam Blab 23:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article has been on two minutes.. it is actually a cut and paste job from here so could be speedied but the editor is working on it as we speak. I sent him a welcome notice explaining about copyright. The subject has written a lot on his field. Waterden (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: I have rewritten as much as I can in the time I have. Hopefully someone can add to it. I have tagged the obvious. Waterden (talk) 00:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Delete  Just removed the speedy per modifications Just tagged as a G12 copyvio . But still needs major sourcing to support notability assertions.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looking at this I'd say the man is a notable published writer. Google throws up loads more, too.   SIS   13:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Awards=Notability. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 17:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Editor for leading hunting magazines such as these is notability. The material for notability was in the article even when it was nominated for deletion; the copyvio would ofc course have been a reason for speedy deletion if it hadnt been quickly fixed. DGG (talk) 23:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It looks plenty notable based on the awards + rewrite.  JBsupreme (talk) 06:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep without prejudice to re-list: give the editor community time to work it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.