Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Brown (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Craig Brown (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced and advertorially toned WP:AUTOBIO of an actor, who has no strong claim to passing WP:NACTOR. There's enough here that he would probably be eligible for an article if it could be sourced properly, but the references here are his IMDb profile and glancing acknowledgements of his existence in coverage that fails to be about him -- and, as always, even if he can be shown to clear NACTOR the path to getting a Wikipedia article still doesn't pass through writing it himself. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody else can do better than this, but an actor doesn't automatically get a Wikipedia article just because roles are listed in it; he gets one when he can be shown as the subject of enough reliable source coverage to support one. Bearcat (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete none of the sources show the indepth coverage needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.