Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Harvery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Craig Harvery

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:ATHLETE Shadowjams (talk) 10:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, There is no reliable sources, which are needed for basic notability. : Majen27  ·  talk  10:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete despite being a Call of Duty fan. SGGH ping! 10:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete bio of a person with no notability presented. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Obviously not notable.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No way he passes WP:ATH or any notability guideline.-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 02:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: per G10 as an attack article.  RGTraynor  05:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, although it's certainly not an attack article. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 00:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Reply: You don't fancy that an article with a misspelled name, a fake photo and much of the text being "Game of choice is Call of Duty, while online with young immature children. His ultimate goal in life is to reach a death/kill ratio of 0.65" is an attack article?  RGTraynor  03:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't pass WP:N. To be fair RGTraynor, while I agree with you, it could be correct that the subject could be someone who very well may have the loftiest goal in life to excel on Call of Duty.  Some people do play cards with half a deck.  Just sayin'.  -Pparazorback (talk) 06:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Reply: Terrific, and when that's been heavily and reliably sourced, an issue can be made of it. WP:BLP still applies, and it's mandated to wipe clear unsourced negative comments on sight.  RGTraynor  12:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.